Heads up: the easy free way to put an AI-built page online usually makes it public and searchable on Google. Pagelive keeps yours private →
+ +

Compare

The Qwilr alternative for proposals you already wrote with AI.

Qwilr builds web proposals in its own editor, with quotes, e-sign and payments. Its custom domain and who-viewed analytics start on Growth at $275 a month. If you write the proposal in Claude or ChatGPT, Pagelive sends it on your own domain and tells you who read it, for $15/mo flat.

Start your 10-day trial. $15/mo after, cancel anytime.

+ +

The quick verdict

Two tools, two jobs

Choose Qwilr

When a sales team sends proposals and quotes from shared templates, and the client should accept, sign and pay on the same page, with the deal synced to the CRM.

Choose Pagelive

When the proposal is a page you built in Claude or ChatGPT, and the job is to send it on your own brand, keep it private, know who read it and get the answer on the page. One flat price, no seats.

+ +

Qwilr pricing

What Qwilr costs, as of September 2026

Per user on Starter, with Growth and Scale sold as annual packs of users. From Qwilr’s own pricing page.

StarterGrowthScale
Price$35 per user/mo, billed annually$275/mo, 5 users included$750/mo, 10 users included
Monthly billing$49 per user/moAnnual onlyAnnual only
Each extra user$35$55$75
E-sign, accept, quotes, paymentsYesYesYes
Password protectionYesYesYes
Custom domainNoYesYes
Identity analytics (who viewed)NoYesYes
Analytics history60 days120 daysUnlimited
Salesforce integrationNoNoYes

From qwilr.com/pricing and its feature table as shown on September 30, 2026, in USD. Prices are listed as “Starting at”. The 14-day free trial covers Starter and needs no card. Payments carry a 0.09% Qwilr fee on Starter and 0% on Growth and Scale, plus Stripe’s fees. Plans change; check their pricing page.

Qwilr’s Starter already covers password protection, notifications and page analytics. The two things a consultant usually wants next, the proposal on your own domain and knowing exactly who opened it, are Growth features, and Growth starts at 5 users.

+ +

Side by side

Feature comparison

QwilrPagelive
Built forSales teams sending web proposals and quotesSending an AI-built page as a link
Where you write the proposalQwilr’s editor and templatesClaude, ChatGPT or any HTML
E-sign, quotes and paymentsEvery planNo
HubSpot, Pipedrive, ZohoEvery planNo
Password protectionEvery planSolo and Team
Custom domainGrowth and ScaleSolo and Team
Know who viewedGrowth and ScaleSolo and Team
Price modelPer user, Growth from 5 usersFlat
Custom domain from$275/mo, billed annually*$15/mo

*Qwilr column from qwilr.com/pricing as shown on September 30, 2026: Growth “$275 USD per month”, “Includes 5 users”, “Annual billing only”. Rows we could not confirm on their site are left out.

+ +

What Pagelive does

Tracked proposals, without the proposal editor

Write the proposal where you already work, publish it as a link, and get the signal you actually wait for.

Know who read it

An email when the proposal is opened, with how long they read. With a verified email or a recipient link, you see who it was.

Your domain, your brand

The link lives on your own domain, with the Pagelive badge removed on Solo. No 5-user minimum to get there.

The answer on the page

The client comments on a line, suggests the exact wording, and presses Approve or Request changes. A reply form on the page sends their “let’s go” to your inbox.

Revise at the same link

Change the scope or the price and publish again. The client’s link stays the same, and version history keeps each round.

Private by default

Password, email gate or view-once link. Every page is noindex and served apart from your account.

Any page you built

Publish the HTML Claude or ChatGPT wrote, as it is. No template to fit it into, and “publish this” in a Claude chat returns the tracked link.

How AI proposal writing and sending fit together →
+ +

Honest answer

When Qwilr is the better fit

If the client should accept a quote, sign and pay in one place, if your team works from a shared template and saved-block library, or if deals need to land in HubSpot, Pipedrive or Salesforce, Qwilr is built for that and Pagelive does not do those things. Stay with it. Pagelive earns its keep when the proposal is a live page you built with AI, and what you need after sending is to know it landed, who read it, what they commented and whether they approved.

+ +

Pricing

What Pagelive costs

Free

$0

2 public pages, a view count and a first-open alert.

Solo

$15/mo

$150/yr. Unlimited proposals, gates, every-open alerts, your domain.

Team

$49/mo

$490/yr. One workspace, up to 10 people, one flat price.

Full plan comparison →
+ +

Qwilr alternative FAQ

For one job, yes: sending a proposal as a web page and knowing when the client reads it. Qwilr also does quotes, e-sign, payments and CRM integrations. If you already write the proposal with AI and need it on your own domain with who-viewed tracking, Pagelive does that for a flat price instead of Qwilr’s Growth plan.

Also weighing other proposal tools? See the Proposify alternative, the PandaDoc alternative and the Better Proposals alternative. Running deals with several stakeholders? See a digital sales room for small teams.

+ +

Your domain. Know who read it.

A branded, private, tracked link for the proposal you wrote with AI. Start your 10-day trial. $15/mo after, cancel anytime.